Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Harris v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 93 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1928-10-24 No. 1351
Disposition: (No. 1351-Claimant awarded $54.61.) Award: $54.61 Agency: Department of Trade and Commerce
Cite as: Harris v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 93 (1928)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Harris v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 93 1928-10-24 (No. 1351-Claimant awarded $54.61.) /opinions/v06-p0116-1/

W. E. HARRIS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a Deputy Fire Marshal, sought reimbursement for travel expenses incurred during official duties. The court awarded the claimed amount of $54.61, noting the Attorney General's recommendation and the lack of an appropriation.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES AND SALARIES-when award will be made for traveling expenses. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

Claimant in this case, in his own behalf, represents, in his declaration, that he is now and was during the month of June, 1927, employed by the State of Illinois, as Deputy Fire Marshal in the Division of Fire Prevention of the Department of Trade and Commerce; that during said month, in pursuance of his official duties and under the direction of the Fire Marshal, was obliged to travel between certain cities, viz: Flora, Altamont, Olney and Robinson, all in the State of Illinois; that his traveling expenses in such official duties amounted to $54.61, and an itemized statement appears attached to said petition; that no appropriation was made to take care of said expenses. A statement filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, suggests that a recommendation made by the State Fire Marshall, that same be allowed, be considered by this court.

We accordingly award claimant in this case the sum of $54.61.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.