Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Kinkaid v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 92 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1928-10-24 No. 1312
Disposition: (No. 1312-Claimant awarded $40.00.) Award: $40.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Kinkaid v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 92 (1928)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Kinkaid v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 92 1928-10-24 (No. 1312-Claimant awarded $40.00.) /opinions/v06-p0115-1/

ALEXANDER M. KINKAID, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought refund of franchise taxes erroneously paid to the Secretary of State for years after the company's charter had expired. The court found no tax was due and awarded the amount paid.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when award will be made for franchise tax paid after

This is a claim for refund of franchise tax erroneously paid by the International Boiler Compound Company, of Chicago, Illinois, for the years of 1924, 1925, 1926 and 1927, to the Secretary of State after the expiration of its charter in October, 1923.

It is admitted by the Secretary of State that the charter of the International Boiler Compound Company had expired [*93] in October, 1923, and that the franchise fees paid for the years 1924, 1925, 1926 and 1927 in the sum of Ten Dollars for each year, making a total of Forty Dollars, should not have been collected by the office of the Secretary of State.

As it is clear no tax was due, and as it is recommended by the Attorney General that an award be allowed the International Boiler Compound Company in the sum of Forty Dollars, an award for that amount is accordingly allowed.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.