Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Hair v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1928-10-25 No. 1299
Disposition: (No. 1299-Claimant awarded $469.50.) Award: $469.50
Cite as: Hair v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 (1928)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Hair v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 1928-10-25 (No. 1299-Claimant awarded $469.50.) /opinions/v06-p0117-1/

HELEN HARTZEL HAIR, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages for injuries sustained when struck by a state motorcycle officer on duty. The court sustained the state's demurrer as a matter of law but made an award in the interest of social justice.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when an award will be made. Where it appears that OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant in this case alleges, in her declaration filed on May 25th, 1927, that she was injured by reason of having been struck by a motorcycle, driven by a State Motorcycle Officer, Harold Lenox, on a State road, being Route 2, leaving from Amboy to Dixon, Illinois, while said officer was in the performance of his duties, said accident having occurred on June 15th, 1926; that as a result of said accident she was bruised, injured and wounded and her left leg was broken.

Claimant asks only her actual damages sustained. The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is sustained as a matter of law.

In the interest of social justice and the public welfare, we believe that an award should be made in this case, and we accordingly award the claimant the sum of Four Hundred Sixtynine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($469.50).

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.