Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Williams v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 368 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-12 No. 1093
Disposition: (No. 1093-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) Award: $2,000.00 Agency: University of Illinois
Cite as: Williams v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 368 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Williams v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 368 1927-05-12 (No. 1093-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) /opinions/v05-p0388-1/

MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS BY WILLIAM TED WILLIAMS, HER NEXT FRIEND, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a minor, was struck by a University of Illinois truck driven by a state employee. The court sustained a demurrer on legal liability but awarded $2,000.00 in equity and good conscience.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. RESPONDENT SUPERIOR-State not liable. The State is not liable for the SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY-award may be made. While the State is not

The declaration filed in this case on November 4, 1926, alleges that Mary Elizabeth Williams is a resident of the city of Urbana, Champaign county, Illinois, and that she was a resident of said county on December 14, 1925, and that she was a minor and the daughter of William Ted Williams, who is appearing for her as next friend; that on said date she was proceeding on and along Green street, a public highway in [*363] the city of Urbana, Champaign county, Illinois, upon the sidewalk along the south side of said Green street, and that as she was proceeding upon said sidewalk along said street, with all due care and caution for her own safety, and proceeding in an easterly direction, having crossed the intersection of said Green street with Lincoln avenue in said city of Urbana, she was struck by an automobile five-ton truck, owned by the University of Illinois, and driven by A. A. Johns, who then and there was in the employ of the State of Illinois, in the occupation of hauling cinders for said University of Illinois, and that while she was so proceeding across said Lincoln avenue, said A. A. Johns drove said truck of said University of Illinois at a high rate of speed along and upon said Green street at a high and dangerous rate of speed, and did then and there turn his said automobile at such high rate of speed from said Green street, upon which he was then and there driving in an easterly direction, onto said Lincoln avenue, to proceed in a southerly direction, in such a reckless manner that he drove to and upon and collided with said Mary Elizabeth Williams, who had already proceeded across said Lincoln avenue, and struck her as she was stepping on and upon the curbing on the east side of Lincoln avenue, knocking her down to and upon the pavement, and causing severe bruises, fractures and lacerations, causing the displacement of two ribs and further derangement of her physical and nervous system, so that she has been from that time hitherto incapacitated for duties in and about her home, and has been caused to expend large amounts of money in obtaining medical attention, and has suffered great physical pains and discomfort, and claimant files claim for damages in the amount of $2,000.00.

A demurrer to this declaration was filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, and, as a matter of law, the demurrer is sustained.

Considerable evidence was taken on behalf of the claimant, and from a careful consideration of same it appears that the girl was injured on account of the carelessness of A. A. Johns, a State employee. It is difficult to determine the extent of the injuries, and, inasmuch as she does not come within the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, we believe that a fair compensation is all that is asked. While there is no legal liability on the part of the State of Illinois, in equity and good conscience, we award claimant the sum of $2,000.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.