Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Ellithorpe v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-12 No. 1090
Disposition: (No. 1090-Claimant awarded $412.00.) Award: $412.00 Agency: State Highway Department
Cite as: Ellithorpe v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Ellithorpe v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 1927-05-12 (No. 1090-Claimant awarded $412.00.) /opinions/v05-p0387-1/

RAYMOND ELLITHORPE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a truck driver for the State Highway Department, was injured in a work-related accident. The court found the claim reasonable and just, and recommended payment of $412.00.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. HARD ROADS-when employee entitled to award. Reimbursement. There OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEHM-

The claimant, a resident of the city of Elgin, Illinois, aged [*368] 24 years, was an employee of the State Highway Department on the 29th day of October, 1923, and for several years prior thereto, and while on said day he was engaged in his occupation as a truck driver in the reconstruction of the Higgins road in Cook county, Illinois, when he was injured, another truck striking his truck, breaking both bones in his left leg.

There appears to be no contention but that the claimant was in the employ of the State while he was operating his truck and received his injury in the course of his employment.

He makes a claim including medical and hospital aid of $412.00. The Department of Public Works and Buildings in a letter to the Attorney General concedes that claimant is justly entitled to the claim of $412.00.

This court is of the opinion that the claim is reasonable and just and therefore this court recommends that claimant be allowed payment of $412.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.