Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Judge v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-12 No. 1106
Disposition: (No. 1106-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) Award: $2,000.00
Cite as: Judge v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Judge v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 1927-05-12 (No. 1106-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) /opinions/v05-p0390-1/

THOMAS JUDGE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant was injured while employed in road construction when struck by an automobile. The court awarded $2,000, approximately 50% of total disability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, as a fair allowance.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-award made to injured employee of OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEIM-

It appears that the claimant was employed in the construction of hard roads north of the village of Gardner, Grundy county, Illinois, and while claimant was pouring tar and filling cracks in the concrete of said hard roads, he was struck by an automobile being driven north.

It appears that the claimant was knocked unconscious, and it appears from the evidence that the right shoulder bone and right arm were broken and three ribs on the right side of the body were fractured.

The measure of damages in this case, following precedent and law, must measure under the Workmen's Compensation Act; therefore, the only controversy before the court is as to whether or not the claimant sustained permanent total disability or compensation for the total permanent loss of the use of the right arm.

This court is of the opinion that the record would not sustain total disability, yet, as a matter of equity and good conscience, it is the desire of the court to be as liberal as consistently possible.

We are therefore of the opinion that approximately 50% of the total disability, measured by the Workmen's Compensation Act, would be a fair and adequate allowance under all the facts and circumstances in this case.

Therefore, it is recommended by the court that the claimant be allowed $2,000.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.