Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

McCoy v. State of Illinois

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 182 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1985-02-27 No. 82-CC-0621
Disposition: (No. 82-CC-0621-Claim denied.)
Cite as: McCoy v. State of Illinois, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 182 (1985)
General Court of Claims 37 denied 1980s McCoy v. State of Illinois 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 182 1985-02-27 (No. 82-CC-0621-Claim denied.) /opinions/v37-p0264-1/

ROOSEVELTMcCoy, JR., ANNETTE GRIFFIN a n d WILLIE LOGAN, Claimants, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought damages for negligence after their car collided with a state tow truck in a marked safety zone. The court found the state was not negligent and denied the claim, holding the claimant driver entirely at fault.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: 89 Ill. App. 3d 865, 409 N.E.2d 336

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (ROBERT J. SKLAMBERG, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. NEGLIGENCE-elements of negligence action. In an action based on negligence, the Claimants must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant owed the Claimants a duty, that the duty was breached by a negligent act or omission, and that the breach proximately caused a compensable injury.
  3. PERSONALINJURY-Claimantstruck State wrecker clearing accident on expressway-Claimant at fault-claim denied. The Claimant was entirely at fault when he drove his automobile through a safety zone marked by flares and collided with a State tow truck which was working to clear away accident on expressway, and the claim for the resulting injuries sustained by Claimant and his passengers was denied, since he crossed into the area the State was trying to clear, notwithstanding the ample warning given by the emergency lights on the tow truck and other vehicles at the scene.

On October 18,1980, between 10:30 p.m. and 11:OO p.m. Claimant Roosevelt McCoy, Jr., drove his automobile through a safety zone marked by flares and [*183] collided with Respondent’s tow truck. Claimants Willie Logan and Annette Griffin were passengers in the McCoy automobile at the time of the incident.

Claimants McCoy and Logan seek damages from the State of Illinois and allege that Robert Hanson, the State driver, negligently backed the Respondent’s tow truck into Claimant McCoy’s car.

Robert Hanson, who had served in the emergency traffic patrol of Chicago for 11 years, observed a fourcar accident in the right-hand lane of the Dan Ryan Expressway. The wreckage was about 50 feet north of the end of the far right-hand lane of the Dan Ryan. That lane becomes the exit ramp from the Dan Ryan to the Eisenhower Expressway.

Hanson placed his tow truck immediately behind the last of the four cars in the accident. He was then approached by one of the drivers who had been involved in the accident and was told there were injured drivers and passengers. Hanson then immediately called for help on his radio.

Hanson then marked the accident area with flares to warn the approaching public of the accident. He then set several flares, one for every other white lane-marking line, along the length of the accident scene. These flares were placed along the left boundary of the right lane for five or six car lengths. Before Hanson marked the area with flares, he tried to ascertain whether he could provide first aid to any of the accident victims. The flares Hanson set usually burn for 20 minutes.

Also at the scene of the accident was a police car, an ambulance and another tow truck. At no time did any of these vehicles or the tow truck of Respondent block the exit ramp to the Eisenhower Expressway.

[*184] In addition to the line of flares which marked the scene of the accident, Hanson turned on all of the tow truck‘s emergency lights, which were tow revolving yellow lights, four high-intensity rear flashers, a red flasher and two roof top, high intensity flashers also alternating. The flashing blue lights of the police car were also turned on, as well as the flashing lights of the paramedics’ vehicle.

Hanson then started removing the vehicles from the right lane of the expressway after he checked with the paramedics, who were assisting with the victim lying alongside the third car, to see if he could tow the third car. He was backing his tow truck toward the third car when he looked through the rear window to be certain where the paramedics were working. He was approximately two car lengths from the third car in the right lane and was backing his truck at approximately two miles per hour when Claimant McCoy’s car left the center lane of the northbound Dan Ryan lanes and crossed between the tow truck and the third car. The left rear of the tow truck, which was perpendicular to the Claimant’s car, hit the car’s left rear quarter panel.

It appears therefore that the oncoming traffic was given ample warning by the emergency lights of the tow truck, the police car and the ambulance, all of which were visible for a very considerable distance. Despite this, the Claimant’s car crossed into the area where the State was endeavoring to clear out the disabled cars so that normal traffic could resume.

There is some question raised by Claimant McCoy’s testimony that he thought the flares were out, but even if they were, the flashing lights on three, and possibly four, vehicles at the scene should have given ample warning to the traveling public that there were problems ahead.

[*185] The evidence regarding the flashing lights is completely uncontradicted and Claimant McCoy admitted that the flashing lights on the lead tow truck were operating.

This case proceeds under the tort of negligence, whose elements are well defined by case law. Claimants must show by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent owed Claimant a duty, and that duty was breached by a negligent act or omission which proximately caused a compensable injury. 89 Ill. App. 3d 865,409 N.E.2d 336.

At no time was the exit from the Dan Ryan to the Eisenhower Expressway blocked. Testimony indicates that McCoy’s automobile suddenly traversed the safety zone to gain access to the westbound Eisenhower exit ramp. This was when the accident between the tow truck and the Claimant’s car occurred.

It is the Court’s opinion that Respondent was in no way negligent in attempting to clear away the wreckage of the accident and that the entire fault lay with the Claimant driver.

Award denied.

Official volume 37 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1985 – July 1, 1984–June 30, 1985)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.