MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A Corporation: Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, VARIOUS STATE AGENCIES, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for goods or services from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

ComAcrs-hpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a I claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the , amount due claimant.

NEWKIHK GIFFIN,WINNINC,LINDNER, AND COHEN, At- ! , torney f o r Claimant. i WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PERLIN, C.J.

SPRINGFIELD RADIOLOGISTS, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, Respondent.

Opinion filed August 30, 1971.

SPRINGEIELD RADIOLOGISTS, Claimant, pro se. [*243]

I

I WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. I I WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent. !

CoNTRAcTs-/n)~scd crppropriation. When the appropriation from which a , I claim should haw hern paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an a\vartl for the amount duc- clnimint. t PERLIN, C.J.