Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Peter Stavros v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 241 Illinois Court of Claims Filed August 30, 1971 No. 5584
Disposition: (No. 55M-Claimant awarded $342.52.) Award: $342.52 Agency: Department of Mental Health
Cite as: Peter Stavros v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 241 (1971)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Peter Stavros v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 241 August 30, 1971 (No. 55M-Claimant awarded $342.52.) /opinions/v27-p0255-2/

PETER STAVROS, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $342.52 for food services rendered to patients of the Department of Mental Health in July 1967. The court found the amount was erroneously sent to a hotel instead of claimant and awarded the full sum.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ~ ONTH ~ ( : . r - f ~ r r f l ? ~ e f ) i infer)wetfltion r,s of rules. Where resp(1ndcilt f;iilrd t o pay clairnairt for s c ~ r \ ~ i w sdiw bec:iiise of an erroneous intcrprcbtatioil o f tlcpartiiicnt;il riilcs. ;in a\Kird will be c ~ ~ t e r r for t l clainiant.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Stipulation of [*242] the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; THIS COURT FINDS that this claim in the amount of $342.52 is for food services rendered by the claimant to patients of the Department of Mental Health during the month of July, 1967, and that the reason said amount was not previously paid is that due to an erroneous interpretation of departmental rules, this sum was sent to the New Elms Hotel, which sum was to be remitted to the claimant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sum of $342.52 be awarded to claimant in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State under Cause No. 5584.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.