Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Pierce v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-01-15 No. 1481
Disposition: (No. 1481-Claimant awarded $400.00.) Award: $400.00
Cite as: Pierce v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 (1930)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Pierce v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 367 1930-01-15 (No. 1481-Claimant awarded $400.00.) /opinions/v06-p0388-1/

A. N. PIERCE, GEORGE PIERCE, AND JOSEPH PIERCE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought $800 for damage to a clover crop from a fire communicated from the defendant's asphalt tank furnace. The court found $400 reasonable and recommended an award of that amount.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when award will be made. The Court finds from all

This is a claim to recover damages suffered by claimants on April 5th, 1929, caused by reason of a fire communicated from an asphalt tank furnace of the defendant while working along and upon the State road, bordering upon claimant's property.

From all facts and circumstances, it would indicate that the fire was communicated from coals of fire from this tank and that about forty acres of clover crop of the claimants, was damaged and destroyed.

The claimants ask for $20.00 an acre, or $800.00 as reasonable damage, but from all of the evidence in this case, this court is convinced that that allowance would be more than the facts would permit; however, there should be some allowance and the court recommends that claimants be allowed $10.00 an acre, for the loss of the clover crop in question, or a total of $400.00.

Therefore, we recommend an award in the amount of $400.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.