Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Jones v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 Illinois Court of Claims Filed May 9, 1929 No. 1434
Disposition: <caption-cut> Award: $556.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Highways
Cite as: Jones v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Jones v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 May 9, 1929 <caption-cut> /opinions/v06-p0294-1/

ORAL R. JONES, 1134; J. S. HUTSON, 1135, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought damages for corn crops destroyed when a state highway employee set fire to roadside grass and weeds, which spread to their land. The court awarded $556.00, as the Attorney General agreed the facts and law were undisputed.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when award will be made. Where it appears that

This is a consolidated claim which is filed for damages growing out of the burning of certain crops of corn on the respective claimants' lands. The lands of the claimants abut upon the public highway known as State Bond Issue Road, between the villages of Homer and Sidney in the County of Champaign, State of Illinois.

On the 10th day of October, A. D. 1928, an employe of the State of Illinois acting under the direction and supervision of the Highway Department of the State of Illinois set fire to grass and weeds growing along said highway and by reason thereof the fire spread on the adjoining lands owned [*274] by the claimants causing growing corn to catch fire and be consumed. This was a total loss to the claimants.

The Attorney General filed his statement setting forth that the facts have been correctly stated and that there is no dispute as to the law, and recommends that an award be made.

We therefore, award the claimants the sum of $556.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.