Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Carolin Goines

53 Ill. Ct. Cl. 455 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 2001-03-27 No. 00-CV-1319
Disposition: (No. 00-CV-1319-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Carolin Goines, 53 Ill. Ct. Cl. 455 (2001)
Crime Victim Compensation 53 denied 2000s In re Carolin Goines 53 Ill. Ct. Cl. 455 2001-03-27 (No. 00-CV-1319-Claim denied.) /opinions/v53-p0643-1/

In re APPLICATION OF CAROLIN GOINES

Case summary

Claimant sought benefits under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for the murder of her son, but the court affirmed denial because she failed to file within the statutory period and did not prove a legal disability extending beyond August 25, 1997.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: 740 ILCS 45/1 et seq.; 740 ILCS 45/6.1(a); 740 ILCS 45/22(f); 740 ILCS 45/22(h); 735 ILCS 5/13-211

Cases cited: In re Application of Bauldo (1992), 44 Ill. Ct. Cl. 449

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION ACT-limitations period. Pursuant to the Crime Victims Compensation Act, claims must be filed within one year of the crime, although the Court of Claims may extend the filing period for up to one year upon good cause shown, and in order for the statute of limitations to be extended, the Claimant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she was under a legal disability which was so severe that the Claimant was prevented from filing the application on a timely basis.
  2. SAME-Claimant’s son murdered-two week legal disability did not cure untimely filing-claim denied. Although the evidence supported the Claimant’s contention that drug abuse and depression brought on by her son’s 1996 murder placed her under a legal disability for a two-week period following the murder, there was no evidence that her legal disability extended beyond that period and, since she did not timely file her application for crime victims compensation, her claim was denied.
  3. 456 53 Ill. Ct. Cl.

OPINION

HESS, J.

This cause is before the Court on a recommendation from a Commissioner of this Court following a hearing. This Court denied Claimant’s application for benefits under the Crime Victims Compensation Act (740 ILCS 45/1 et seq.), on January 10, 2000, on the basis that Claimant failed to file an application within two years of occurrence of the crime as required by section 6.1(a) of the Act.

Claimant filed a timely request for a hearing, and a hearing was held before Blanche Hill Fawell, a Commissioner of this Court on August 23, 2000.

At the hearing, Claimant testified that after her son, Robert Howard, was murdered on June 13, 1996, she began to suffer severe clinical depression and also became a heroin addict. As a result she was unable to file her application within two years of the occurrence of the murder.

Claimant introduced into evidence various medical records. These documents show that the Claimant was admitted as an in-patient at Mt. Sinai Hospital where she was treated for major depression and heroin abuse from August 12, 1997, until August 25, 1997. The depression and drug abuse were caused by the murder of the victim.

Claimant testified that she was also treated for depression at Madden Mental Health Center and at another facility which has since closed. No medical records from these institutions were presented.

The statute of limitations for claims filed under the Illinois Crime Victim Compensation Act is contained in section 22(f) of the Act, which states that claims must be filed within one year of the crime. Section 22(h) states that this time limit is jurisdictional. Section 45/6.1 of the [*457]

In re Goines 457 Act states that the Court may extend the filing period not to exceed one year upon good cause shown.

In order for the statute of limitations to be extended, the Claimant has the burden of proving that she was under a legal disability. (See section 13-211 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/13-211.) The Claimant must prove the claim by a preponderance of the evidence. (In re Application of Bauldo (1992), 44 Ill. Ct. Cl. 449.) This legal disability must be so severe that the Claimant was prevented from filing the application on a timely basis.

The Court has considered the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the Claimant. The Court finds that the Claimant was suffering from legal disability, depression, from August 12, 1997 until August 25, 1997. There was no further evidence of treatment of depression except for the Claimant’s statements that she did receive treatment. No dates were provided to the Court nor were any medical records or doctor’s statements. In addition, the Claimant testified that she was a heroin addict until April 22, 1999.

The murder of the victim took place on June 13, 1996. The Claimant has failed to submit proof to the Court that she suffered from legal disability after August 25, 1997, when she was released from Mt. Sinai Hospital.

It is hereby ordered that the January 10, 2000, order of this Court denying Claimant’s application for benefits under the Crime Victims Compensation Act is affirmed and that this claim is closed.

Official volume 53 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 2001 – July 1, 2000–June 30, 2001)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.