Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

Deloris Armstrong v. State of Illinois

48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 657 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1996-06-07 No. 94-CV-3047
Disposition: (No. 94-CV-3047-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Deloris Armstrong v. State of Illinois, 48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 657 (1996)
Crime Victim Compensation 48 denied 1990s Deloris Armstrong v. State of Illinois 48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 657 1996-06-07 (No. 94-CV-3047-Claim denied.) /opinions/v48-p0541-1/

DELORIS ARMSTRONG, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought compensation for funeral expenses after her nephew was shot to death. The court denied the claim because the decedent's gang membership and participation in gang activity provoked and contributed to his death.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: 740 ILCS 45/10.1(d)

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION ACT-victim’s conduct and gang membership contributed to his death-claim denied. An application for benefits under the Crime Victims Compensation Act by the aunt of a deceased crime victim was denied, because the evidence showed that the victim and his alleged assailant were members of opposing street gangs, the shooting in which the decedent was killed was precipitated by gang rivalry and prior gang incidents, and therefore the victim’s conduct provoked and contributed to his own death.

ORDER

SOMMER, C.J. On September 29, 1993, James Earl Thomas was shot to death on West Jackson in the City of Chicago.

[*658] Pursuant to the Crime Victims Compensation Act, a claim was made by Deloris Armstrong, the decedent’s aunt, for funeral expenses she had paid. On December 6, 1994, this Court originally denied the application for benefits submitted by the Claimant due to the fact that the Claimant’s decedent was participating in gang activity which contributed to his death.

A hearing on the matter was held on August 14, 1995. Submitted during the course of the hearing was the report of the pathologist who conducted an autopsy on Mr. Thomas. In his opinion, the decedent died as a result of multiple gunshot wounds to the body. According to the reports submitted by the Chicago Police Department, the decedent was found at the scene of the shooting in clothes which exhibited gang graffiti and symbolism. A friend of the victim informed the police that Mr. Thomas was a member of the Black Gangster Disciples. That person also indicated that the victim was in that location to talk with another gang about a prior fight. The investigating officers checked the Chicago Police Department records and determined that the victim was a Black Gangster Disciple, with a criminal record. Further investigation by the police confirmed that the victim was at the scene of the shooting because of a prior incident. The man eventually arrested for shooting Mr. Thomas admitted that the motive for the shooting was a previous gang altercation.

It is clear that the victim and the alleged offender in this case were from opposing street gangs. This incident occurred because of their gang affiliation, gang rivalry and previous gang incidents. The victim’s conduct and his membership in a gang provoked and contributed to his own death and, therefore, the claim will be denied under 740 ILCS 45/10.1(d), which states that an award may be denied where the decedent provoked and contributed to his own death.

[*659] It is therefore ordered that this Court’s order of December 6, 1994, is affirmed and the present appeal is denied.

Official volume 48 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1996 – July 1, 1995–June 30, 1996)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.