Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Murzyn v. State of Illinois

45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 143 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1992-09-24 No. 87-CC-0178
Disposition: (No. 87-CC-0178-Claim denied.) Agency: Illinois Department of Transportation
Cite as: Murzyn v. State of Illinois, 45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 143 (1992)
General Court of Claims 45 denied 1990s Murzyn v. State of Illinois 45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 143 1992-09-24 (No. 87-CC-0178-Claim denied.) /opinions/v45-p0247-1/

KOBERTMURZYN,as Special'Administratorof the Estate of DAVID A. MURZYN,Deceased, and KOBERT MURZYN and BEVERLY MURZYN, Individually, Claimants, u. THE STATE O FILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants alleged that decedent died after his car hit a pothole on a state highway, causing a tire blowout and rollover. The court denied the claim because testimony and evidence showed no potholes were present and the decedent lost control of his vehicle.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

ROBERT MURZYN, as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID A. MURZYN, Deceased, and KOBERT MURZYN and BEVERLY MURZYN, Individually, Claimants, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinionfiled September 24, 1992.

PIERCE & MEYER, for Claimant.

ROLAND W. BURRIS, Attorney General (JANICE SCHAFFRICK, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

HIGHWAYS-automobile accident-failure to prove existence of pothole-claim denied. The Court of Claims denied a claim filed by the administrator of the decedent's estate which alleged that the decedent was [*144] killed when he lost control of the car he was driving after hitting a pothole, since the testimony of the investigating officer, an accident reconstruction expert, an eyewitness, and a State employee who inspected the roadway after the accident indicated that no potholes were present at the scene and that the decedent lost control of his vehicle causing it to roll over.

OPINION

BURKE, J. .

Hearing on the above-entitled claim was held on October 22, 1991. Pierce & Meyer, by James F. Carlson, appeared on behalf of the Claimants herein. Roland Burris, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, by Janice Schaffrick, appeared on behalf of the Respondent, State of Illinois.

On June 5, 1985, David A. Murzyn, the decedent, was operating his automobile in a northerly direction on and along Illinois Highway Route 394 at a point approximately 15 miles north of Joe Orr Road overpass, in Sauk Village, Illinois. Riding in said automobile as a passenger was John D. Gariffa.

Mr. Gariffa testified that the car was proceeding northbound in the inner lane, the lane nearest the median strip, at a speed of approximately 65 m.p.h. He stated that the roadway seemed bumpy, and that the right front wheel of the automobile struck a pothole. As a result, the right front tire blew out, and the car veered to the right and the driver brought it back to the left and it entered the median strip where it rolled completely over and relanded upright on its wheels on the southbound roadway of Route 394. He described the pothole as 10 to 12 inches in diameter and four to six inches deep.

As a result of the above, Robert Murzyn was thrown from the vehicle. He was taken by paramedics to St.

James Hospital in Chicago, where he was pronounced [*145] dead. An autopsy was performed on his body and the cause of his death was the result of multiple and extreme . injuries to his head, neck and body.

Sergeant Paul Smith of the Illinois State Police testified that he arrived at the scene of the accident shortly after the occurrence. The injured parties were still on the ground and he assisted the paramedics. He made his investigations. He stated that the right front and right rear tires of the vehicle involved were flat, He examined the right front tire and it appeared to be “smooth and worn.”

He sent for an accident expert and Peter Chico appeared on the scene. Together they examined the roadway where the skid marks began and found no potholes in the road.

In his opinion the road was in good condition.

Peter Chico, the accident reconstruction expert, testified that there were on the road “yaw” marks, and that a “yaw” mark is a tire mark left on the pavement as the result of a vehicle rolling and slipping at the same time.

He calculated from his computations that the vehicle was traveling at 64 m.p.h. He stated that on the day after the accident, he examined the roadway and saw no potholes.

James Cannon, an employee of the Illinois Department of Transportation, stated that he is the head of the Calumet maintenance yard which encompasses the area where the accident occurred. He and two co-workers walked over the area of the accident. They found no potholes or anything requiring their attention or service by his department. He identified certain photographs of the roadway in question taken by him and testified that the photographs show no evidence of potholes.

The evidence deposition of Michael Kirk, a witness to the accident, was introduced into evidence by agreement.

He testified he saw the vehicle involved in the accident [*146] approaching from his rear so he moved from the left or inner lane to the right lane. When the vehicle passed him it was going 65 m.p.h., when it was about 20 feet ahead of him and to his left, he heard a loud bang, and the vehicle veered to the left and then to the right and then to the left again when it entered the median strip. It rolled over, ending up on its wheels in a diagonal position on the southbound lane of Highway 394.

Claimants have failed to sustain their burden of proof. The concrete highway where the accident occurred was in good condition and no potholes were present. The evidence clearly indicates that the decedent lost control of his vehicle causing it to enter the median and roll over.

Wherefore, it is hereby ordered that this claim be denied.

Official volume 45 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1993 – July 1, 1992–June 30, 1993)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.