Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Lourdene E. Johnson A'

42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1989-07-28 No. 90-CV-0198
Disposition: (No. 90-CV-0198-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) Award: $3,000.00
Cite as: In re Lourdene E. Johnson A', 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 (1989)
Crime Victim Compensation 42 awarded 1980s In re Lourdene E. Johnson A' 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 1989-07-28 (No. 90-CV-0198-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) /opinions/v42-p0483-1/

In re APPLICATION OF LOURDENE E. JOHNSON a'

Case summary

The claimant sought compensation for funeral and burial expenses after her son died from injuries sustained in a reckless homicide. The court granted an extension of time to file and awarded the maximum $3,000 for funeral and burial expenses.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 70, par. 76.1; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 9-3

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. C RIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-limitations on filing claim. SAME-file-date stamp on notice of intent unclear-petition to extend SAME-funeral and burial expenses-maximum recovery. The SAME-reckless homicide-award for funeral and burial expenses

Order filed July 28,1989.

Opinion filed March 27,1990.

LOURDENE E. JOHNSON, pro se, for Claimant.

I '

NEIL F. 'HARTIGAN,Attorney General (J AMES MAHER, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

C RIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-limitations on filing claim. Pursuant to the Crime Victims Compensation Act, a notice of an intent to file a claim must be filed within six months of the crime and the claim must be filed within one year of the crime, but the Court of Claims may extend the time for filing the notice of intent to file a claim for a period not exceeding one year.

SAME-file-date stamp on notice of intent unclear-petition to extend time for filing application granted. In proceedings on a claim based on the death of the Claimant's son as the result of a reckless homicide, the Claimant's petition to extend the time for filing an application was granted, even though no notice of intent or petition was filed within six months of the date of the crime, since the record showed that the victim survived longer than that, and the illegible nature of the file-date stamp on the notice the Claimant gave to the Office of the Attorney General precluded a determination of whether the notice was provided within the &month period from the date of the incident the Court of Claims was authorized to allow for the filing, and therefore the Court held the notice was filed within the period in which the Court was authorized to grant an extension.

SAME-funeral and burial expenses-maximum recovery. The maximum award which can be made under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for funeral and burjal expenses is $3,000.

SAME-reckless homicide-award for funeral and burial expenses granted. Where the Claimant complied with all of the pertinent provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act and had received no reimbursements that could be counted as an applicable deduction under the Act, the Claimant was granted the maximum award for the funeral and burial expenses incurred as a result of the death of her son due to a reckless homicide.

ORDER

PATCHETT,

J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the petition of Lourdene Johnson for an extension of time to file documents to claim compensation under the Crime [*396] Victims Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch.70, par. 71 et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the Act. Due notice of the filing of the petition has been given, no objection has been filed, and the Court, being advised, finds as follows:

Pursuant to section 6.1 of the Act, a person seeking compensation must file a notice' of intent to seek compensation with the Office of the Attorney General within six months of the occurrence. (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 70, par. 76.1.) An application must be filed with the Court of Claims within one year of the date of the occurrence. The Court may extend each deadline for a period not to exceed one year.

In the petition at bar, the incident was said to have occurred on August 29, 1987. The victim died on September 22, 1988. A notice of intent was filed thereafter. Funeral and burial expenses are sought. The petitioner is the mother of the victim. The victim was 21 years old on the day of the incident. As an explanation for late filing, the petitioner stated her time had been consumed with seeking medical care for her son.

It is apparent that neither the notice of intent nor the petition was filed within six months of the date of the incident. The decedent survived longer than that. What is not clear is the date that the petitioner gave the notice to the Office of the Attorney General. This Court is authorized to extend the time for providing the notice for a period not to exceed 18 months from the date of the incident. The file-stamp date of the Office of the Attorney General is totally illegible. We are unable to read whether or not the notice was provided within 18 months of the incident.

We hold, under such circumstances where we are [*397] unable to read the file-stamp date, that the notice has been filed within the period in which we are authorized to grant an extension.

It is hereby ordered that the petition at bar be, and hereby is, granted; it is further ordered that the petitioner file an application within 60 days of the date of this order.

OPINION

POCH,J.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on August 29, 1987. Lourdene E. Johnson, mother of the deceased victim, John Michael Johnson, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.).

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on August 7, 1989, on the form prescribed by the Attorney General, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds:

1. That the Claimant’s deceased son, John Michael Johnson, age 21, was a victim of a violent crime as defined in section 2(c) of the Act, to wit: reckless homicide (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 9-3). The victim was injured on August 27,1987, and expired from his injuries on September 22,1988.

2. That the crime occurred in Orland Park, Illinois, and all of the eligibility requirements of section 6.1 of the Act have been met.

[*398] 3. That the Claimant seeks compensation for funeral and burial expenses.

4. That the Claimant incurred funeral and burial expenses in the amount of $5,726.52, all of which has been paid. Pursuant to section 2(h) of the Act, funeral and burial expenses are compensable to a maximum amount of $3,000.

5. That the Claimant has received no reimbursements that can be counted as an applicable deduction under section lO.l(e) of the Act.

6. That the Claimant, Lourdene E. Johnson, has filed a civil action, Johnson u. Galuin, No. 87 L 24761, in the circuit court of Cook County, Illinois, as a result of the incident. The Claimant, by informing the Attorney General’s office of her pending civil suit, has acknowledged her responsibility to further notify the Attorney General of the final disposition of the civil action, pursuant to section 17 of the Act.

7. That the Claimant has complied with pertinent provisions of the Act and qualifies for compensation thereunder.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) be and is hereby awarded to Lourdene E. Johnson, mother of John Michael Johnson, an innocent victim of a violent crime.

Official volume 42 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1990 – July 1, 1989–June 30, 1990)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.