Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Kaufman Grain Co. v. State of Illinois

42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1989-10-11 No. 90-CC-0206
Disposition: (No. 90-CC-0206-Claimant awarded $10,200.00 plus interest.) Award: $10,200.00
Cite as: Kaufman Grain Co. v. State of Illinois, 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 (1989)
General Court of Claims 42 awarded 1980s Kaufman Grain Co. v. State of Illinois 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 1989-10-11 (No. 90-CC-0206-Claimant awarded $10,200.00 plus interest.) /opinions/v42-p0378-1/

KAUFMAN GRAIN Co, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. ’

Case summary

The claimant sought $10,200 plus interest under a circuit court consent decree for an attorney fee dispute. The court approved the joint stipulation for settlement and awarded the amount plus statutory interest.

Claim type: Contract

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 127, par. 1014.1

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (F RANK A. HESS, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. ATTORNEY FEES-fee dispute-joint stipulation-award granted. In the matter of a claim arising from an attorney fee dispute pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act which was settled by a consent decree, an award was entered according to the parties’ joint stipulation for settlement, notwithstanding the fact that the Court of Claims is not bound by such agreements, since there was no reason to prolong the controversy, the parties entered into the agreement with full knowledge of the facts and the law, it was for a just and reasonable amount, and the Court had no reason to question the suggested award.

This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for settlement which states:

This claim arises from an attorney fee dispute pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 127, par. 1014.1), which was [*291] settled, and by consent decree, reduced to judgment in the Sangamon County Circuit Court.

The parties have investigated this claim, and have knowledge of the facts and law applicable to the claim, and are desirous of settling this claim in the interest of peace and economy.

Both parties agree than an award of $10,200, pursuant to the circuit court order, is both fair and reasonable.

Claimant agrees to accept, and Respondent agrees to pay Claimant $10,200, plus statutory interest, in full and final satisfaction of this claim and any other claims against Respondent arising from the events which gave rise to this claim.

The parties hereby agree to waive hearing, the taking of evidence, and the submission of briefs.

This Court is not bound by such an agreement, but it is also not desirous of creating or prolonging a controversy between parties who wish to settle and end their dispute. Where, as in the instant claim, the agreement appears to have been entered into with full knowledge of the facts and law and is for a just and reasonable amount, we have no reason to question or deny the suggested award. '

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded $10,200.00 plus statutory interest, in full and final satisfaction of this claim.[*292]

Official volume 42 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1990 – July 1, 1989–June 30, 1990)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.