Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Richard H. Newhouse v. State of Illinois

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1984-11-27 No. 85-CC-0489
Disposition: (No. 85-CC-0489-Claimant awarded $ll,O.OOplus interest.) Award: $11,600.00
Cite as: Richard H. Newhouse v. State of Illinois, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 (1984)
General Court of Claims 37 awarded 1980s Richard H. Newhouse v. State of Illinois 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 319 1984-11-27 (No. 85-CC-0489-Claimant awarded $ll,O.OOplus interest.) /opinions/v37-p0401-1/

RICHARD H. NEWHOUSE, JR., Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought attorney fees of $11,600.00 pursuant to a federal court order. The court granted summary judgment and awarded the full amount plus interest at 9% per annum from April 27, 1984.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Rybicki v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6030; Crosby v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6093; DelValle v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6052

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. JENNER NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (H. ALFRED RYAN, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. SUMMARY JuDcMm-Federal court order that State pay Claimant’s attorney fees as prevailing party in Federal court-award granted. Based on an order of a Federal court requiring the State to pay Claimant an amount for attorney fees as a prevailing party in the Federal court action, an award was granted plus interest, since the Claimant’s attorney presented an affidavit representing that the State did not oppose the entry of an order granting an award and the State did not object to the Claimant’s motion for summary judgment.

This cause comes on to be heard on the Claimant Richard H. Newhouse, Jr.’s motion for summary judgment.

Claimant’s claim is founded upon an order of a three-judge district court in the northern district of Illinois in the consolidated cases of Rybicki v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6030, Crosby v . State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6093 and DelValle v. State Board of Elections, No. 81 C 6052. On April 27,1984, the three-judge court ordered that Respondent pay Claimant the amount of $11,600.00 as and for attorney fees as a prevailing party.

Claimant’s motion for summary judgment seeks an award in the amount of $11,600.00 plus 9%interest per annum pursuant to statute.

The affidavit of Claimant’s counsel represents that Respondent does not oppose the entry of an order in accordance with the relief sought, and Respondent in fact has not objected to the motion.

It is therefore ordered, that Claimant, Richard H. Newhouse, Jr., is awarded $11,600.00 plus interest at the rate of 9%per annum from April 27, 1984, in full and complete satisfaction of this claim.[*321]

Official volume 37 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1985 – July 1, 1984–June 30, 1985)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.