(No 83-CC-2737-Claimant awarded $24,787 00.) BRITT OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC., Claimant, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment for duplicating and microfilming card files for the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement. The State agreed to an award based on a lapsed appropriation, and the court ordered payment of $24,787.00.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (KATHLEEN O'BRIEN,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent. I
- LAPSED APPROPRIATlONS-dUp~iCating and microfilming-stipulationclaim allowed. Based on the stipnlatlon of the parties, claim was allowed for duplicating and microfilming, as claim was standard lapsed appropriation claim which should he paid
- STIPULATION
This is a lapsed appropriation claim. The State agrees to an entry of an award based on the report filed in this matter which provides the following information: Agency: Department of Law Enforcement Purpose: For duplicating and microfilming the card files for the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement, division of support services, at Joliet laboratory.
Fund No. 001-45402-1200-00 Fiscal Year: FY81
A mount: $24,787.00 Claimant's social security or tax No. Sufficient funds lapsed to cover this claim.
[*322] ORDER
ROE, C.J.
The record in this cause indicates that this is a standard lapsed appropriation claim which should be paid in accordance with the above stipulation. It is so or der ed.