Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Lauren L. Liss v. State of Illinois

36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1983-08-29 No. 83-CC-1707
Disposition: (No. 83-CC-1707-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) Award: $2,000.00 Agency: Board of Regents of the Regency University System
Cite as: Lauren L. Liss v. State of Illinois, 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 (1983)
General Court of Claims 36 awarded 1980s Lauren L. Liss v. State of Illinois 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 1983-08-29 (No. 83-CC-1707-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) /opinions/v36-p0385-1/

LAUREN L. LISS, Claimant, 0. THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE REGENCY UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought settlement for an unspecified claim; the court entered an award of $2,000.00 based on a stipulation filed by Respondent.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. STiPuLATIoNs-ioint stipulation-claim allowed. Based on the joint stipulation of the parties, claim was allowed in full and final settlement against State.

This matter comes before the Court upon stipulation of Respondent. It is the Court’s understanding that the parties hereto have agreed that Claimant is entitled to the sum of $2,000.00 as full, final and complete settlement against the Respondent.

The stipulation, filed by Respondent, states that Claimant and her attorney have agreed to settle this case for said sum.

Award is hereby entered in favor of Claimant in the amount of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars, and according to a letter from Claimant’s counsel at Northern Illinois University, said check in the above amount should be made payable to Lauren L. Liss and Mark J. Liss.

Official volume 36 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1984 – July 1, 1983–June 30, 1984)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.