Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Paul Wasserman v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1982-10-13 No. 83-CC-0281
Disposition: (No. 83-CC-0281-Claimant awarded $5,000.00.) Award: $5,000.00 Agency: Illinois State Police
Cite as: Paul Wasserman v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883 (1982)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Paul Wasserman v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883 1982-10-13 (No. 83-CC-0281-Claimant awarded $5,000.00.) /opinions/v35-p1039-1/

PAUL WASSERMAN, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant was arrested by Illinois State Police based on a warrant for a different Paul Wasserman. The State stipulated to a $5,000 settlement, which the court allowed.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. T YRONE C. FAHNER, Attorney General (WILLIAM R. WALLIN,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. STIPULATIONS-false arrest-claim allowed. Where State stipulated that it caused Claimant to be arrested pursuant to warrant which should have been served on other person who had same name, award was granted in amount agreed to in stipulation in full settlement of claim arising from wrongful arrest.

On Saturday, March 6, 1982, the Claimant, Paul Wasserman, who resides at 1420 Jonquil Terrace, Chicago, Illinois, was arrested by the Illinois State Police acting pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the circuit court of Cook County. The arrest was made on the complaint of the Department of Registration and Education which had charged a Paul Wasserman with practicing dentistry without a license. After being handcuffed and removed from his residence, he was placed in a squad car and driven to the Chicago office of the Department for further processing. Only after additional questions was there a determination made that the wrong Paul Wasserman had been arrested.

The State has stipulated that it caused the wrong Paul Wasserman to be arrested and has agreed that this claim should be settled for $5,000.00.

While this Court is not bound by the stipulation, such a stipulation will not be rejected out of hand. It appears that the parties have seriously considered the merits of this claim. Such being the case, the Court [*884] allows the stipulation of the parties.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant, Paul Wasserman, be awarded the sum of $5,000.00 as full and final satisfaction arising out of the arrest of the Claimant.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.