Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Richard and Emily Krueger v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 736 Illinois Court of Claims Filed December 21, 1982 No. 80-CC-1415
Disposition: (No. 80-CC-1415-Claimants awarded $2,000.00.) Award: $2,000.00
Cite as: Richard and Emily Krueger v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 736 (1982)

RICHARD and EMILY KRUEGER, Claimants, 0. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought damages for fences damaged by the State's negligent snow removal on Route 64. The court awarded $2,000.00 based on the State's stipulation.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. T YRONE C. FANNER, Attorney General (SANDRA L. ANDINA, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. IhcnwAYs-snow remooul-rlumagerl fences-stipulution-claim ullotoed. Award was granted to Claimants for damage to fences which occurred when State snowplows were engaged in s n o w removal adjacent t o fences.

ARNOLD AND KADJAN, for Claimants.

POCH,J.

This matter coming before the Court on stipulation of Respondent to the entry of an award in favor of Claimants in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) as and for damage to Claimants' fences incurred by Respondent's negligent acts or omissions in removing snow from Route 64 adjacent to said fences between January 5 and February 20, 1979, the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises; now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that Claimants be and are hereby awarded the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) in full and final settlement of their claim.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.