Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Loretta Riordan v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 413 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1981-09-17 No. 82-CC-0294
Disposition: (No. 82-CC-0294-Claimant awarded $20,000.00.) Award: $20,000.00 Agency: Chicago Police Department
Cite as: Loretta Riordan v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 413 (1981)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Loretta Riordan v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 413 1981-09-17 (No. 82-CC-0294-Claimant awarded $20,000.00.) /opinions/v35-p0570-1/

LORETTA RIORDAN, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, widow of first deputy superintendent James J. Riordan, sought an award under the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act after her husband was shot and killed while escorting a man from a bar. The court found no wilful misconduct or intoxication and awarded $20,000.00 as provided by law.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 281 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 283

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TYRONE C. FAHNER, Attorney General (KATHLEEN O’BRIEN,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FIREMEN COMPENSATION Acr-shooting death-tavern disturbance-claim allowed. Award granted to widow of fireman who was killed by gun shot while decedent was escorting man with gun away from bar in which man had caused disturbance.

Claimant seeks an award as the widow and statutory beneficiary of first deputy superintendent James J. Riordan, pursuant to the provisions of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 281 et se9.

The Court has reviewed Claimant’s application for benefits together with the written statement of decedent’s supervisor, and has also reviewed the police reports of the Chicago Police Department, the medical examiner’s certificate of death and the report of the Attorney General. From its consideration of these documents the Court finds : [*414] 1. A claim was filed herein by Loretta Riordan, widow of James J. Riordan, first deputy superintendent of the Chicago Police Department, who died on June 6, 1981, from gunshot wounds; 2. Loretta Riordan, as widow, is entitled to payment pursuant to section 3 of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 283) which provides that the surviving spouse is entitled to the entire award where there is no designation of beneficiary on file; 3. The police reports state that on June 6, 1981, decedent was escorting a man who had caused a disturbance from a bar. The man had a gun in his hand and while the decedent was escorting him from the bar, the decedent was shot. He died from his wounds a short time later; 4. The medical examiner’s certificate of death lists the cause of death as bullet wound-neck (internal jugular vein and transection cervical cord); 5. There is nothing in the circumstances to suggest that decedent’s death resulted from the wilful misconduct or intoxication of the decedent; 6. The facts as herein reported are in compliance with the requirements of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 281 et seq.). Claimant, as widow of James J. Riordan, is entitled to an award of $20,000.00 as is provided by law.

By reason of the foregoing, it is hereby ordered that an award of $20,000.00be, and is hereby made to Loretta Riordan, the widow and statutory beneficiary of James J. Riordan, as is required by the provisions of the Law [*415] Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act.

Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48,par. 281 et seq.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.