Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Allen v. State of Illinois

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-10-08 No. 81-CC-0414
Disposition: (No. 81-CC-0414-Claimant awarded $5,175.00.) Award: $5,175.00
Cite as: Allen v. State of Illinois, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266 (1980)
General Court of Claims 34 awarded 1980s Allen v. State of Illinois 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266 1980-10-08 (No. 81-CC-0414-Claimant awarded $5,175.00.) /opinions/v34-p0366-1/

JULIUS 0. ALLEN, Claimant, u. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant was awarded $5,175.00 for damages as set forth in the complaint and stipulation, in full satisfaction of all claims related to an incident on or about March 24, 1972.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PRACTICEAND PROCEDURE-joint stipulation was reasonable and would be approoed b y court. An award of $5,175.00 was granted in complete satisfaction of all claims arising from damages suffered by Claimant where the joint stipulation of the parties as to liability and damages was reasonable and fair and was approved by the Court of Claims.

This matter coming before the court upon motion of Respondent pursuant to the stipulation executed by the parties hereto, and the court being fully advised in the premises: [*267]

It is hereby ordered that Claimant be, and he is hereby, awarded the sum of $5,175.00 as and for his damages as set forth in said complaint and stipulation.

It is further ordered that said award shall be in complete satisfaction of all claims which Claimant has, or had, on or about March 24, 1972, or which he may have had at the time of filing his second amended complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Official volume 34 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1981 – July 1, 1980–June 30, 1981)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.