Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Eva-Tone v. State of Illinois

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 256 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-10-01 No. 80-CC-2062
Disposition: (No. 80-CC-2062-Claim denied.) Agency: Illinois Office of the Secretary of State, Research Department
Cite as: Eva-Tone v. State of Illinois, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 256 (1980)
General Court of Claims 34 denied 1980s Eva-Tone v. State of Illinois 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 256 1980-10-01 (No. 80-CC-2062-Claim denied.) /opinions/v34-p0356-1/

EVA-TONE, EVATYPE, INC., Claimant, u. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment under a contract with the Illinois Secretary of State Research Department. The court denied the claim because a departmental report established that the claim exceeded the contract amount, and the claimant filed no response to the motion to dismiss.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-departmental report established that claim was in excess of contract. Claim denied where departmental report issued by office of Secretary of State established that claim was in excess of the contract between Claimant and Secretary of State’s Research Department.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent to dismiss, said motion having been previously held in abeyance pending submission to the Court of the contract which gave rise to this cause of action, it appearing to the Court that due notice has been given, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

The Court hereby finds:

1. That Rule 14 of the Rules of the Court of Claims of the State of Illinois states that departmental reports issued by State departments or agencies are considered prima facie evidence of the facts set forth therein.

2. That the departmental report issued by the Illinois Office of the Secretary of State, Research Department, a State department or agency, attached hereto and made a part hereof, establishes that this claim is in excess of the contract between the Claimant and the Illinois Secretary of State Research Department.

3. That this departmental report is prima facie evidence of the facts set forth therein.

4. That the Claimant has filed no response to the motion to dismiss.

It is hereby ordered that this claim be, and hereby is denied.

Official volume 34 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1981 – July 1, 1980–June 30, 1981)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.