Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re L. Mildred Sutherland

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 445 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-05-27 No. 79-CV-0389
Disposition: (No. 79-CV-0389-Claim dismissed.)
Cite as: In re L. Mildred Sutherland, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 445 (1980)
Crime Victim Compensation 33 dismissed 1980s In re L. Mildred Sutherland 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 445 1980-05-27 (No. 79-CV-0389-Claim dismissed.) /opinions/v33-p0521-1/

In re APPLICATION OF L. MILDRED SUTHERLAND.

Case summary

The claimant sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for the death of her son, who was struck and killed after a traffic dispute. The court dismissed the claim because the victim's death was substantially attributable to his own provocation of the assailant.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et se9.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 1-3.

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General (W ILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am- wrongful act or substantial prouocation.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on June 4,1978, in Bureau County, Illinois. L. Mildred Sutherland, mother of the victim, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et se9.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents submitted to the Court, the Court finds: 1. That the Claimant’s deceased son, Gregory Sutherland, age 25, was a victim of a violent crime as defined in section 2(c) of the Act, to wit: Battery. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 1-3. 2. That on June 4,1978, Claimant’s son was struck in the face by Roger Richardson after arguing over a traffic dispute. All witnesses to the incident stated that Gregory Sutherland verbally threatened Roger Richardson and pushed him. Mr. Richardson then struck Mr. Sutherland in the face. Mr. Sutherland fell to the ground striking his head on the pavement. Mr. Sutherland died on June 5, 1978, of head injuries. 3. That section 3(b)of the Act provides that a person is entitled to compensation under the Act if the injury to or the death of the victim was not substantially attributable to the victim’s wrongful act or substantial provocation of the assailant. 4.That it appears from the investigatory report and the police report that the victim’s death was attributable [*447] to his substantial provocation of the assailant when he verbally threatened the assailant and then pushed him. 5. That the Claimant has not met a required condition precedent for compensation under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that the claim of L. Mildred Sutherland be, and is hereby dismissed.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.