Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Joseph Burkes and in Re Application of Valerie Addison

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 428 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-06-18 No. 78-CV-0775
Disposition: (No. 78-CV-0775-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Joseph Burkes and in Re Application of Valerie Addison, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 428 (1980)
Crime Victim Compensation 33 denied 1980s In re Joseph Burkes and in Re Application of Valerie Addison 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 428 1980-06-18 (No. 78-CV-0775-Claim denied.) /opinions/v33-p0504-1/

In re APPLICATION OF JOSEPH BURKES and In re APPLICATION OF VALERIE ADDISON.

Case summary

The claimants sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for the death of Willie Addison, who was shot after an altercation. The court denied the claim because the victim's conduct substantially contributed to his death.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 9-1

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CIUME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-wrongful act or substantial provocation. The Court shall determine the degree or extent to which the victim’s acts or conduct provoked or contributed to his injuries or death and reduce or deny the award accordingly.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on August 17, 1978. Joseph Burkes and Valerie Addison, father and wife, respectively of the deceased victim, Willie Addison, seek compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et se9.

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds:

1. That Willie Addison, age 22, was a victim of a violent crime as defined in section 2(c) of the Act, to wit: Voluntary Manslaughter. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 9-1.

2. That on August 17, 1978, the victim was shot several times by an offender who was known to him. The [*429] incident occurred in the lobby of the apartment building at 7456 South Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois. Minutes before the shooting, the victim had become involved in an altercation with the offender. During the altercation, the victim struck the offender, inflicting a wound on the offender’s eye. After being struck, the offender ran to his home several doors away and obtained a handgun, returning to the scene of the altercation within minutes. At that time, the offender shot the victim several times. The victim was taken to Jackson Park Hospital, where he expired shortly after admission. The offender was apprehended and entered a plea of guilty to the charge of voluntary manslaughter.

3. That the Claimant, Joseph Burkes, seeks compensation for funeral expenses only. He was not dependent upon the victim for support.

4.That the Claimant, Joseph Burkes, incurred funeral and burial expenses as a result of the victim’s death in the amount of $1,400.00.

5. That the Claimant, Valerie Addison, seeks compensation for loss of support for herself and for her minor child, Dametre Damont Davis, age one.

6. That section 7(c) of the Act, states that the Court of Claims shall determine the degree or extent to which the victim’s acts or conduct provoked or contributed to his injuries or death and reduce or deny the award of compensation accordingly.

7 . That the Court finds that the victim’s conduct contributed to his death to such a substantial degree as to warrant a full denial of this claim pursuant to section 7(c) of the Act.

It is hereby ordered that the claims of Joseph Burkes and Valerie Addison be, and are, hereby denied.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.