Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Hunter Bowie v. State of Illinois

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 285 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-04-11 No. 79-CC-0830
Disposition: (No. 79-CC-0830-Claimant awarded $450.00.) Award: $450.00
Cite as: Hunter Bowie v. State of Illinois, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 285 (1980)
General Court of Claims 33 awarded 1980s Hunter Bowie v. State of Illinois 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 285 1980-04-11 (No. 79-CC-0830-Claimant awarded $450.00.) /opinions/v33-p0361-1/

HUNTER BOWIE, Claimant, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respon- dent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages for property damage to his automobile caused by a collision with a State-owned tractor operated by a State employee. The court accepted the joint stipulation of negligence and damages and awarded $450.00.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General (GLEN P. LARNER, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. NEGLIGENCE-traffic accident involving State employee.
  3. PRACTICE AND PRocEoum-approval of settlements. It is the province of the Court to adjudicate claims on the basis of its own determinations of law and fact and consequently, the Court is not bound by any such determinations agreed upon by the parties.

This claim arose from a vehicular collision at the intersection of Illinois Route 71 and the exit road from [*286] Matthiessen State Park in LaSalle County, Illinois. The Claimant was waiting in his automobile at the exit road facing north where it meets Illinois Route 71, preparing to turn onto Route 71. At the same time, an employee of the Respondent was operating a State-owned tractor westbound on Route 71, intending to turn left onto the park road where the Claimant was situated. The tractor ‘ operator turned left in front of Claimant’s automobile and onto the park road, but instead of straightening out his tractor after completing the turn, he continued turning to the left and collided with the left rear fender of the Claimant’s automobile. Although Claimant himself was not physically injured, the left rear portion of his automobile was damaged.

The above facts have been presented to the Court by means of a joint stipulation signed and agreed upon by both parties. The stipulation further sets forth that the Claimant was in the exercise of due care for his own safety and the safety of his property, that Respondent’s employee was negligent in making his turn, and that this negligence was the cause of the collision. Both parties agree that the damages equal $450.00 and that an award in that amount should be made.

It is the province and the duty of the Court to adjudicate claims on the basis of its own determinations of law and fact, and, consequently, the Court is not bound by any such determination agreed upon by the parties to a claim. The Court, however, is not desirous of creating a controversy where none exists, and will not peremptorily reject a joint stipulation which offers a basis for a fair and reasonable resolution to the claim. Where, as in this instance, the joint stipulation sufficiently sets forth the proper elements necessary for a well-founded decision, and appears to have been entered into freely and with [*287] knowledge of the circumstances relative to the claim, the Court will accept it and grant an award accordingly.

Claimant is hereby awarded the amount of $450.00.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.