Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. State of Illinois

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 267 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1979-07-02 No. 79-CC-0361
Disposition: (No. 79-CC-0361-Claimant awarded $62.00.) Award: $62.00
Cite as: North Central Airlines, Inc. v. State of Illinois, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 267 (1979)
General Court of Claims 33 awarded 1970s North Central Airlines, Inc. v. State of Illinois 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 267 1979-07-02 (No. 79-CC-0361-Claimant awarded $62.00.) /opinions/v33-p0343-1/

NORTHCENTRAL AIRLINES, INC., Claimant, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for a ticket sold to the State of Illinois that was not used due to an employee's injury. The court found the ticket was sold in good faith and awarded $62.00.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmAcrs-airline ticket not used.

This matter comes before the Court upon a motion filed by Respondent to dismiss said claim.

The basis of the claim heretofore filed is that the State of Illinois purchased a ticket from Claimant for one of its employees. The employee in question, before the flight, sustained an injury and did not make the flight. It appears that the ticket itself was lost and the airline was not notified that the ticket was lost and would not be used until after the pctual flight.

The Court finds that the ticket was sold to the State of Illinois in good faith and the factthat it was not used is not the fault of Claimant.

It is hereby ordered Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied and an award is made to Claimant in the amount of $62.00.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.