Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Tommy Lynn Morris v. State of Illinois

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1979-09-13 No. 77-CC-0551
Disposition: (No. 77-CC-0551-Claim denied.) Agency: Menard Correctional Center
Cite as: Tommy Lynn Morris v. State of Illinois, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 (1979)
General Court of Claims 33 denied 1970s Tommy Lynn Morris v. State of Illinois 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 1979-09-13 (No. 77-CC-0551-Claim denied.) /opinions/v33-p0249-1/

TOMMY LYNN MORRIS, Claimant, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $24.00 for loss of monthly allotment while wrongfully placed in segregation. The court denied the claim because claimant failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not presenting the claim to the Administrative Review Board.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General, for Respon- PRISONERSAND INMATES-monthly allotment. Where Claimant was wrong-

TOMMY LYNN MORRIS, Claimant, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed September 13,1979.

TOMMY LYNN MORRIS, pro se, for Claimant.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General, for Respondent.

PRISONERSAND INMATES-monthly allotment. Where Claimant was wrongfully placed in “segregation” and thereby wrongfully deprived of his monthly allotment he should have taken his claim to the Administrative Review Board before pursuing it in the Court of Claims and, in failing to do so, he did not exhaust all available remedies.

HOLDERMAN, J .

Claimant was incarcerated as an inmate at the ’ Menard Correctional Center. He filed this claim based on loss of pay at the rate of $8.00 per month for three months, or a total of $24.00.

It appears to the Court that this claim is based upon the theory that Claimant was wrongfully placed in “ segregation.” The Administrative Review Board of the Menard Correctional Center found that this incarceration was incorrect and on an appeal prosecuted by Claimant within the administrative framework of the Administrative Review Board at Menard, the disciplinary action against Claimant was cancelled and “compensatory good time” for the time spent by Claimant in the disciplinary segregation was restored.

One of the aspects of disciplinary segregation was that Claimant would not receive his monthly allotment in the amount of $8.00 per month, which is awarded to each inmate in general population and in good standing within the correctional center.

The evidence discloses that Claimant admitted he had failed to present his claim for $8.00 per month for [*174] the three months involved at the time of his hearing before the Menard Correctional Center Administrative Review Board.

It appears to this Court that Claimant has failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to him.

Claim denied.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.