Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Alice Taylor Clark

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 737 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1976-12-02 No. 75-CV-799
Disposition: (No.75-CV-799-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Alice Taylor Clark, 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 737 (1976)
Crime Victim Compensation 31 denied 1970s In re Alice Taylor Clark 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 737 1976-12-02 (No.75-CV-799-Claim denied.) /opinions/v31-p0782-1/

IN RE APPLICATION OF ALICE TAYLOR CLARK, MOTHER OF MARY CORNELIA CLARK, AMINOR.

Case summary

Claimant sought reimbursement under the Illinois Crime Victims Compensation Act for her minor daughter, but failed to appear at a hearing set at her request, leading to denial of the claim.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill.Rev.Stat., 1975, Ch. 70, Pars. 71, let seq.

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION ACT-Dismissal for want of prosecution.

This cause having been set for hearing before the Commissioner of the Court of Claims, the Court finds: 1. That on June 1, 1976, an Order was entered by the Court of Claims denying the claim of Alice Taylor Clark, mother of Mary Cornelia Clark, victim (minor), for reimbursement under the Illinois Crime Victims Compensation Act, (Ill.Rev.Stat., 1975, Ch. 70, Pars. 71, let seq.).

[*738] 2. That a hearing was set for October 13, 1976, at Claimant's request.

3. That Claimant failed to appear for the hearing on October 13, 1976.

WHEREFORE IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. That, for failure to appear and substantiate, Claimant's application for benefits under the Crime Victims Compensation Act is hereby denied; 2. That the Order of the Court of Claims of the State of Illinois hereby stands as final judgment in this case.

Official volume 31 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1976 – July 1, 1975–June 30, 1976; Fiscal Year 1977 – July 1, 1976 – June 30, 1977)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.