Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Elsie E. Smith v. State of Illinois

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 551 Illinois Court of Claims Filed February 3, 1977 No. 76-2354
Disposition: (No. 76-2354-Claimant awarded $12.50.) Award: $12.50 Agency: Illinois Youth Center, Geneva
Cite as: Elsie E. Smith v. State of Illinois, 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 551 (1977)
Legacy General 31 awarded 1970s Elsie E. Smith v. State of Illinois 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 551 February 3, 1977 (No. 76-2354-Claimant awarded $12.50.) /opinions/v31-p0599-1/

ELSIE E. SMITH, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages for eyeglass frames broken when struck by a resident of the Illinois Youth Center. The court awarded $12.50 based on a joint stipulation and the Department of Corrections' report.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respon-

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; This Court finds that this claim is for damages sustained by Claimant, Elsie E. Smith, to her eyeglass frames when she was struck by a resident of the Illinois [*552] Youth Center, Geneva. That the Department of Corrections in their departmental report of November 10, 1976, verified the foregoing facts as alleged by the exhibit attached to the complaint. I It is hereby ordered that the sum of Twelve Dollars I

I

and Fifty Cents ($12.50) be awarded to Claimant in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above-captioned cause.

Official volume 31 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1976 – July 1, 1975–June 30, 1976; Fiscal Year 1977 – July 1, 1976 – June 30, 1977)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.