Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Paul J. Vickroy v. State of Illinois

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 489 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1977-06-23 No. 75-93
Disposition: (No. 75-93-Claimant awarded $3,007.22.) Award: $3,007.22
Cite as: Paul J. Vickroy v. State of Illinois, 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 489 (1977)
Legacy General 31 awarded 1970s Paul J. Vickroy v. State of Illinois 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 489 1977-06-23 (No. 75-93-Claimant awarded $3,007.22.) /opinions/v31-p0537-1/

PAUL J. VICKROY, ROY Y. TATE and CHAMPAIGN NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. Opinion Fled June 23,1977.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages for crop loss due to the State's interference with surface drainage during highway construction. The State stipulated to liability and reduced damages, and the court awarded $3,007.22.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. N EGLIGENCE -alteration of water flow. One who negligently alters the flow of water on the property of an adjacent landowner and thereby causes damages is liable to the adjacent landowner.
  2. DAMAGES-stipuhtion. Where Claimant and Respondent stipulate to facts and damages an award will be entered accordingly.

This is an action by Paul J. Vickroy, a tenant farmer, to recover for damages to growing crops resulting from the interference by Respondent of surface drainage on certain land.

The complaint herein alleges that Respondent acquired by threat of condemnation a right-of-way for an interstate public highway which ran across the east side of certain land farmed by Vickroy. The drainage on the land was on an eastward direction, and in constructing the highway, Respondent interfered with the normal flow of drainage across the land and did not provide for adequate sewers to permit the water to flow under the highway.

The complaint further alleged that the State acted in a negligent and careless manner in interfering with the normal flow of drainage across the property, and that as a result thereof, 23.5 acres of crops were flooded and destroyed in 1973,and that Claimant Vickroy was damaged by reason thereof in the amount of $4,081.42.

At the hearing herein, Respondent stipulated to each and every allegation of the complaint, excepting only Claimant’s allegation of the amount of damage sustained. The parties then stipulated to a reduced damage claim in the amount of $3,007.22.

On consideration of the complaint herein, the allegations of which are admitted by Respondent, and the [*491]

49 1 stipulation as to damages, it is hereby ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of Three Thousand Seven and 22/100 Dollars ($3,007.22).

Official volume 31 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1976 – July 1, 1975–June 30, 1976; Fiscal Year 1977 – July 1, 1976 – June 30, 1977)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.