Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Nadine Adams v. State of Illinois

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1977-06-14 No. 6782
Disposition: (No. 6782-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) Award: $2,500.00
Cite as: Nadine Adams v. State of Illinois, 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 (1977)
Legacy General 31 awarded 1970s Nadine Adams v. State of Illinois 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 1977-06-14 (No. 6782-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) /opinions/v31-p0462-1/

NADINE ADAMS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The parties stipulated to a settlement of $19,213.80, reduced by the respondent's counterclaim recoupment of $16,713.80, resulting in a net award of $2,500.00 to the claimant. The court ordered the stipulation awarded and dismissed the cause.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. S TIPULATION -award. Recovery will be awarded for amount properly due when stipulated between the parties.
  2. POLOS,

This matter coming on to be heard before the Court pursuant to a joint stipulation of the parties thereto, through their respective counsel, and it appearing to the Court from said stipulation that the parties hereto have settled all matters in controversy between them on the basis of a claim of $19,213.80, less Respondent’s recoupment on its counterclaim of $16,713.80, or a net settlement for the Claimant of $2,500.00.

It is therefore ordered that said stipulation be and is hereby awarded as full settlement of her claim the sum of $2,500.OO;

It is further ordered that this cause be and is hereby dismissed pursuant to said stipulation.

Official volume 31 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1976 – July 1, 1975–June 30, 1976; Fiscal Year 1977 – July 1, 1976 – June 30, 1977)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.