Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

Mark B. Jennings v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 673 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-08-14 No. 74-CV-40
Disposition: (No. 74-CV-40-Claimant awarded $910.40.) Award: $910.40
Cite as: Mark B. Jennings v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 673 (1974)
Crime Victim Compensation 30 awarded 1970s Mark B. Jennings v. State of Illinois 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 673 1974-08-14 (No. 74-CV-40-Claimant awarded $910.40.) /opinions/v30-p0702-1/

MARK B. JENNINGS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, .

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for injuries sustained when he came to the aid of a robbery and assault victim. The court found the claim compensable and awarded $910.40 for medical expenses.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stats., 1973 Ch. 70 071 et seq.; Section 72d (2); Section 72(c); Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, Ch. 70, par. 77(a); Section 74

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CRIMEVICTIMS COMPENSATION ACT-Where person is victim of violent crime as defined in the Act; has suffered pecuniary loss of $500 or more; notified and cooperated fully with law enforcement officials immediately after the crime; the victim and the assailant were not related and sharing the same household; the injury was not substantially attributable t o the victims wrongful act or substantial provocation of the victim; and his claim was filed in the Court of Claims within 2 years of the date of injury, compensation is payable under the Act.

[*674] This claim arose out of a robbery and assault in the parking lot of the “Granery” a dance hall in Edwardsville, Illinois. The claimant, Mark B. Jennings, seeks compensation pursuant to provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act hereafter referred to as “The Act.” Ill. Rev. Stats., 1973 Ch. 70 071 et seq.

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Court; and a report by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, which substantiates the matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court, the Court finds as follows:

1. That the claimant was injured in his attempt to come to the assistance of an individual who was being robbed and assaulted. Injuries resulting from such conduct is compensable under Section 72d (2)of the Act, when the assistance is to help an individual against whom a crime of violence is being perpetrated. Assault is defined by Section 72(c) of the Act as a Crime of Violence.

2. That the assistance of the claimant was conduct of a reasonable man under the circumstances.

3. That said crime was promptly reported to the Sheriff of Madison County and claimant has at all times fully cooperated with law enforcement officials.

4. That the assailants have not been apprehended, which fact has no bearing on the eligibility of the claimant for recovery under the Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, Ch. 70, par. 77(a).)

5. Claimant has no knowledge of the indentity of the assailant and the assailant was not a relative or member of claimant’s household.

[*675] 6. The injury sustained by the claimant was not attributable either to his wrongful act or provocation on his part.

7. Claimant has suffered damages in excess of $500 compensible by Section 74 of the Act, ro wit:

Hospital, surgical and doctor bills for repair of fracture of the right mandible.

Hospital & Surgical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $505.40

Physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405.00

Total Compensable

Medical Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $910.40

8. Claimant has received no benefits or other compensation as a result of this injury.

9. Claimant was employed for 22 days prior to the incident but never returned to his employment after the incident and has lost no pay as a consequence.

10. That the proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of this Act, and the claim, therefore, compensable thereunder.

IT Is H EREBY ORDERED that the sum of $910.40 (N I N E H UNDRED T EN DOLLARS A ND FORTY CENTS) be awarded Mark B. Jennings as a “good samaritan” under the applicable provisions of the Act.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.