Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Capitol Glass Company v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 634 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-06-09 No. 75-CC-310
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-310-Claimant awarded $13.90.) Award: $13.90 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Capitol Glass Company v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 634 (1975)
General Court of Claims 30 awarded 1970s Capitol Glass Company v. State of Illinois 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 634 1975-06-09 (No. 75-CC-310-Claimant awarded $13.90.) /opinions/v30-p0663-1/

CAPITOL GLASS COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for materials allegedly furnished to the Secretary of State. The court granted summary judgment against claimant for all items except one for $13.90, which was awarded because claimant could not verify orders or delivery receipts for the other items.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT,Attorney General, for Respond-

Claimant filed a claim against the State of Illinois for material allegedly furnished on behalf of the Secretary of State.

On April 18, 1975, respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment for all of the alleged material furnished except one item in the amount of $13.90. Respondent based its motion on the fact that claimant was unable to verify either the order showing where the goods were ordered or delivery receipts showing where [*635] the items were received by the State with the exception of the item in the amount of $13.90.

Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby entered against the claimant, except in the amount of $13.90 for which judgment is entered against the respondent.

Claimant is awarded the sum of $13.90.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.