Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Pitney Bowes v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 573 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-05-13 No. 75-CC-134
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-13AClaimant awarded $144.00.) Award: $144.00 Agency: Governor's Action Office
Cite as: Pitney Bowes v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 573 (1975)

PITNEY BOWES, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, GOVERNOR’SACTION OFFICE, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered under a contract, but the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded $144.00 due to the claimant.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

J. R. WOODSMALL, BRANCH MANAGER , PIT NEY BOWES,Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.