(No. 75-CC-799-Claimant awarded $122.96.) d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, Respondent. CIMOSKI, d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, pro se. amount due claimant.
Case summary
Claimants sought payment for a contract from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded $122.96 because the appropriation had lapsed and the amount was due.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, CIMOSKI, d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, pro se. K ARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respond- CoNTRAcTS-hpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a
CIMOSKI, d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, Respondent.
Opinion filed April 11, 1975.
FRANK J. CIMOSKI, JAMES R. CIMOSKI, JEROME J. CIMOSKI, d/b/a VAL-A-COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
PER CURIAM.