RELIANCE ELECTRIC CO., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought payment for a contract, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a
RELIANCE ELECTRIC CO., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD, Respondent.
Opinion filed April 9, 1975.
RELIANCE ELECTRIC CO., Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.