Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Unistrut Service Company of St.louis v. Illinois Department of Transportation

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 260 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-01-14 No. 75-CC-428
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-428-Claimant awarded $4,018.00.) Award: $4,018.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Transportation
Cite as: Unistrut Service Company of St.louis v. Illinois Department of Transportation, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 260 (1975)

UNISTRUT SERVICE COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for goods or services from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded $4,018.00 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTSlapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

UNISTRUT SERVICE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.