Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Robert H. Mitchell v. State of Illinois

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 505 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-06-26 No. 74-CC-734
Disposition: (No. 74-CC-73”Claimant awarded $73.33.) Award: $73.33
Cite as: Robert H. Mitchell v. State of Illinois, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 505 (1974)
General Court of Claims 29 awarded 1970s Robert H. Mitchell v. State of Illinois 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 505 1974-06-26 (No. 74-CC-73”Claimant awarded $73.33.) /opinions/v29-p0524-3/

ROBERT H. MITCHELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment on a state warrant that had escheated after not being presented within one year. The court awarded $73.33, finding the warrant was properly issued and the delay was due to misplacement.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WARRANTS-fUndS escheated to State Where funds have escheated to the State because a warrant for its collection was not presented within the one year limitation, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

The record in this cause indicates that the claim is based on a valid State warrant issued by the State of Illinois to the Claimant. The record shows that the claimant failed to present the warrant for payment within one year. The statutes in the State of Illinois provide that funds held for the purpose of honoring State warrants escheat to the State of Illinois after one year from the date of the warrant. Inasmuch as the warrant was not presented within the one year limitation, the funds escheated and the Comptroller was no longer empowered to honor the warrant, and the claimant’s only resource was to make claim for these funds through the Court of Claims. The verified Complaint with the attached affidavit submitted by the claimant constitutes prima facie evidence of the facts set forth in the Complaint. The letter from the Comptroller dated May 13, 1974, in no way refutes the allegations set forth in the Complaint, and the respondent has not challenged these allegations by the submission of any other evidence.

Accordingly, this Court finds that the warrant was a properly issued warrant, and the sole reason the payment was not made was the fact that the warrant was mislaid for a period in excess of one year before being presented for payment.

IT Is THEREFORE ORDERED that the claimant be awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois in the above captioned cause, the sum of SEVENTY-THREE AND 33/100 DOLLARS ($73.33).

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.