STRUCTO DIVISION, KING-SEELEY THERMOS Co., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment under a contract for which the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- STRUCTO DIVISION, KING-SEELEY THERMOS Co., Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; EDWARD L. S. ARKEMA , J R ., Assistant Attorney General, for Respodent.
- CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant,
The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.