Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Structo Division v. State of Illinois

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 265 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-03-08 No. 74-CC-238
Disposition: (No. 74-CC-238-Claimant awarded $28,261.85.) Award: $28,261.85 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Structo Division v. State of Illinois, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 265 (1974)
General Court of Claims 29 awarded 1970s Structo Division v. State of Illinois 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 265 1974-03-08 (No. 74-CC-238-Claimant awarded $28,261.85.) /opinions/v29-p0284-2/

STRUCTO DIVISION, KING-SEELEY THERMOS Co., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment under a contract for which the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. STRUCTO DIVISION, KING-SEELEY THERMOS Co., Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; EDWARD L. S. ARKEMA , J R ., Assistant Attorney General, for Respodent.
  2. CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant,

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.