MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought payment for a contract claim that could not be paid because the appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has.lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
T EXACO, I NC., Claimant, us. STATE OF I LLINOIS, D EPARTMENT
O F A GRICULTURE , Respondent.
Opinion filed September 17, 1973.
TEXACO, I NC., Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
PER CURIAM.