THE PERKIN -ELMER CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment from a lapsed appropriation for goods or services provided. The court awarded $120.00 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- T HE P ERKIN -E LMER CORPORATION, Claimant, us. S TATE OF THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, Claimant, pro se. CONTRACTS-lapSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a
T HE P ERKIN -E LMER CORPORATION, Claimant, us. S TATE OF ILLINOIS, E NVIRONMENTAL P ROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
Opinion filed September 17, 1973.
THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CONTRACTS-lapSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
PER CURIAM.