Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Walart Management Co. v. Illinois Department of Personnel

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 22 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-07-26 No. 73-CC-178
Disposition: (No. 73-CC-178-Claimant awarded $2,025.00.) Award: $2,025.00 Agency: Department of Personnel
Cite as: Walart Management Co. v. Illinois Department of Personnel, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 22 (1973)
Lapsed Appropriation 29 awarded 1970s Walart Management Co. v. Illinois Department of Personnel 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 22 1973-07-26 (No. 73-CC-178-Claimant awarded $2,025.00.) /opinions/v29-p0041-2/

WALART MANAGEMENT Co., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered, but the applicable appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because a lapsed appropriation does not extinguish the obligation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Co”rRACTslapsed appropriation.When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant.

(Ng. 73-CC-284-Claimant awarded $41,400.00.)

FRANK HUBBARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE FAIR AGENCY, Respondent.

Opinion filed July 26, 1973.

FRANK HUBBARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PER CURIAM.

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.