Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Rock Island County v. State of Illinois

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 338 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-06-07 No. 7108
Disposition: (No. 7108-Claimant awarded $64.33.) Award: $64.33
Cite as: Rock Island County v. State of Illinois, 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 338 (1973)
Legacy General 28 awarded 1970s Rock Island County v. State of Illinois 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 338 1973-06-07 (No. 7108-Claimant awarded $64.33.) /opinions/v28-p0355-1/

ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Rock Island County claimed reimbursement for expenses incurred returning fugitives from justice. The court awarded $64.33, finding the expenditure was required by statute and the State's appropriation was inadequate.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Fergus vs. Brady, 277 Ill. 272

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Appropriation-return of fugitives. Claimant would recover for cost of return of fugitives from justice, where State was unable to anticipate the amount necessary to appropriate for this expense.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto and the Court being fully advised in the premises; THIS COURT FINDS that this expenditure was for the return, by Rock Island County, Illinois, of fugitives from justice. The counties are required to travel to other jurisdictions for the return of fugitives when the fugitives have been located and apprehended in various jurisdictions throughout the country. The expenses herein reflect the expenses incurred by Rock Island County, Illinois, in sending their sheriffs and deputies to return apprehended fugitives. The investigation and reports from the Department of Law Enforcement indicate that the appropriations for this purpose were expended and a deficiency appropriation of $zO,OOO.OO was requested.

However, even before the $20,000.00 was received for reimbursing to the various counties for these expenses, it became apparent that even this $20,000.00 deficiency appropriation was going to be inadequate. The original appropriation was expended and the $20,000.00 was used up also, leaving some of these expenses unpaid. Under the rules set forth in Fergus vs. Brady, 277 Ill. 272, this Court finds that inasmuch as the State was unable to anticipate the amount necessary to appropriate for this expense and that since this expenditure was one required of the State by statute, this Court awards the claimant the amount of SIXTY FOUR AND 33/100 DOLLARS ($64.33).

Official volume 28 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1972–June 30, 1973)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.