Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

W. T. Grant Company v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 313 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-05-25 No. 7083
Disposition: (No. 7083-Claimant awarded $85.50.) Award: $85.50 Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Cite as: W. T. Grant Company v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 313 (1973)
Lapsed Appropriation 28 awarded 1970s W. T. Grant Company v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 313 1973-05-25 (No. 7083-Claimant awarded $85.50.) /opinions/v28-p0330-1/

W. T. GRANT COMPANY, Store No. 1106, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS,DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for goods or services from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded $85.50 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ComAas-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

CENTRAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, ECONOMIC AND FISCAL COMMISSION, Respondent.

Opinion filed June 7, 1973.

CENTRAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PER CURIAM.

Official volume 28 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1972–June 30, 1973)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.