Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Jubal W. McKee v. State of Illinois

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 307 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-05-24 No. 73-CC-12
Disposition: (No. 73-CC-12-Claimant awarded $212.40.) Award: $212.40 Agency: Department of Corrections
Cite as: Jubal W. McKee v. State of Illinois, 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 307 (1973)
General Court of Claims 28 awarded 1970s Jubal W. McKee v. State of Illinois 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 307 1973-05-24 (No. 73-CC-12-Claimant awarded $212.40.) /opinions/v28-p0324-2/

JUBAL W. MCKEE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought reimbursement for excessive deductions from his payroll for health insurance premiums due to the Department of Corrections applying family rates instead of individual rates. The court granted judgment on the pleadings and awarded $212.40.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmAcrs-sakzry deductions. Where claimant alleged that excessive deductions were withdrawn from his payroll checks for health insurance benefits, and respondent admits its error and agrees that the claim is justified, an award will be allowed.

This matter is now before the court on claimant’s motion, filed April 27,1973, for judgment on the pleadings.

[*308] Respondent has filed no objections to said motion and has, in fact, acknowledged that this is a justifiable claim for the stated amount by filing a letter dated February 16, 1973, from Joseph S. Coughlin, Acting Director of the Department of Corrections, stating that all of the allegations in the complaint are true to the best of his and that department’s knowledge and belief. The file contains other supporting documents.

In granting claimant’s motion, it is necessary to restate the facts on which this award is based, as required by $18 of the Court of Claims Act.

Complaint was filed herein on January 8, 1973, by Jubal W. McKee for payment of excessive deductions withdrawn from his payroll checks by the Department of Corrections for Blue Cross and Blue Shield Health Insurance benefits.

From November 1, 1970, through and including July 31,1971, Jubal W. McKee was employed at the Valley View Boys’ School, Valley View, Illinois, by the State of Illinois, Department of Corrections. During the above specified period, claimant was covered under a group Blue Cross and Blue Shield Health Insurance program, Insurance Certificate No. 22852-40200.

Premiums on the above specified insurance policy were paid in part by the claimant, and were effectuated by bi-monthly deductions from his payroll check.

The above specified deductions from claimant’s bimonthly check were made in accordance with and were equal to the amount established for family rates which would provide protection for an entire family. In fact, claimant was single during the entire above specified time, and the deductions which should have been made, should have been calculated on the basis of individual rates which would provide individual coverage.

[*309] I

As a result of the above miscalculations, excessive deductions were made during the entire period of time from November 1, 1970, through and including July 31, 1971, and claimant has suffereda loss thereby in the amount of Two Hundred Twelve and 40/100ths ($212.40) Dollars.

The Department of Corrections, after discussing the matter with its chief personnel officer, its legal advisor and others, concluded that this was a payroll error for which the department was responsible.

There being no issue of law or fact before us, we conclude that claimant is entitled to an award for the amount claimed.

Claimant, Jubal W. McKee, is hereby granted an award in the amount of $212.40.

Official volume 28 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1972–June 30, 1973)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.