RODI-CHRISCRAFT,INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment for a claim that should have been paid from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- RODI-CHRISCRAFT,INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, RODI-CHRIS CRAFT, INC.,Claimant, pro se. BROWNE-MORSE COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, BROWNE-MORSE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.
RODI-CHRISCRAFT,INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
Opinion filed April 16, 1973.
RODI-CHRIS CRAFT, INC.,Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
Comas- -lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.