Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Jake Van Yzendoorn v. State of Illinois

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 119 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 14, 1972 No. 5152
Disposition: (No. 5152-Motion of Respondent to dismiss allowed.)
Cite as: Jake Van Yzendoorn v. State of Illinois, 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 119 (1972)
Legacy General 28 dismissed 1970s Jake Van Yzendoorn v. State of Illinois 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 119 November 14, 1972 (No. 5152-Motion of Respondent to dismiss allowed.) /opinions/v28-p0136-1/

JAKE VAN YZENDOORN, Guardian of the Estate of MICHAELVAN YZENDOORN, A Minor; JAKE VAN YZENDOORN, Guardian of the Estate of SHIRLEY VAN YZENDOORN, A Minor; and JAKE VAN YZENDOORN, Administrator of the Estate of SARAH VAN YZENDOORN, Deceased, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought $25,000 for each of two minors and $25,000 for a deceased estate, alleging the State negligently failed to provide adequate traffic control signs at an intersection. The court dismissed the claim, holding that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of the driver of the car in which the claimants were occupants, as previously determined in the Eveland case.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Eveland v. State of Illinois, 25 C.C.R. 256 (1965)

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, and MARTIN SOLL, Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.
  2. HrcHwAys-traffic signs. Where accident caused solely by negligence of driver of car, no recovery would be allowed.

Jake Van Yzendoorn, as Guardian of the estate of Michael Van Yzendoorn, a minor, as Guardian of the estate of Shirley Van Yzendoorn, a minor, and as Administrator of the estate of Sarah Van Yzendoorn, deceased, filed suit against the State of Illinois asking for an award of Twentyfive Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars for each of the two minors and an additional Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars to be paid to him as Administrator of the estate of Sarah Van Yzendoorn, deceased.

The two minors, with their mother, were passengers in a car on the 8th day of March, 1963,which was being driven by one Rheta Hobbs in an easterly direction along and upon Jonathan Creek Road, at or near its intersection with Illinois Route 133, approximately three miles west of Arthur, Illinois, in Moultrie County.

[*120] 120 ,

This car, at said intersection, collided with a car driven by one Duane W. Eveland and then collided with another motor vehicle being operated by one Lester Schrook.

As a result of the collisions, Michael Van Yzendoorn, Shirley Van Yzendoorn, and Sarah Van Yzendoorn were seriously injured. Sarah Van Yzendoorn died as a result of said injuries on the 8th day of March, 1963.

The State is charged with negligence in that it did not have adequate and proper traffic control signs at said intersection.

This case has already been passed upon by this Court as the Administrator of the estate of Duane W. Eveland filed suit asking for a recovery of $25,000.00, and alleged in his complaint that the deceased met his death of March 8, 1963, as a result of the same accident in question.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss citing the Eveland case and its findings.

In view of the fact that the entire question of alleged negligence of the State and all the facts concerning the accident were so clearly and concisely set forth in the Opinion of Judge Perlin, 25 C.C.R., Page 256 (1965), it would be repetitious to go over the same facts again.

The above mentioned decision of this Court held that the accident in question was caused solely by the negligence of the driver of the car in which the Van Yzendoorns were occupants and that it was her negligence, and her negligence alone, which caused the accident, injuries and death complained of.

Wherefore, this Court grants the motion to dismiss the instant cause.

Official volume 28 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1972–June 30, 1973)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.