Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Central Office Equipment Company v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 441 Illinois Court of Claims Filed Jiitie 13, 1972 No. 6619
Disposition: (No. 6619-Claiinaiit a\\~;irdfd$144.00.) Award: $144.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Central Office Equipment Company v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 441 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Central Office Equipment Company v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 441 Jiitie 13, 1972 (No. 6619-Claiinaiit a\\~;irdfd$144.00.) /opinions/v27-p0456-1/

CENTRAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for goods or services from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmAms-Zapwd appropriafiori. \\'hen the appropri;ition froiii \vliich it claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will cnter an n\vnrtl for thv amount due clairiiant.

( No . 6640-Claiiiimt :i\varded $1 18.80.) JOSEPHINE BIRDSONG, Claimant, vs. S TATE O F I LLI N O I S ,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC A ID, Respondent.

[*442] 442 ~

Opinion filed lune 13, 1972.

J OSEPHINE B IRDSONG, Claimant, pro se.

W ILLIAM J . SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

C O N T F I A C T S - ~apr~ropriufion.

U ~ J . Y ~ ~ \Vhen the appropriation f r o i i i whicli i i claim should haw bccn paid has lapseed, the Coiirt will enter an award for thv amount due clainiiint.

I

PERLIN, C.J. i

I

( No . G642-Claimant awarded $350.00.) i ILLINIM OVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF

ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Respondent.

Opinion filed ]tine 13, 1972.

ILLINI MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Claimant, pro se.

W ILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; W ILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CoNmAcn-hpsed u)ip,ropriution. \Vhen the appropriation froiii which ii claim should have been pwid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for thr amount due clairiiant.

P ERLIN, C.J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.